Pruitt v. State

313 S.W.3d 236, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 793, 2010 WL 2378927
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 15, 2010
DocketED 93440
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 313 S.W.3d 236 (Pruitt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pruitt v. State, 313 S.W.3d 236, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 793, 2010 WL 2378927 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

*237 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Derrick Pruitt (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his amended motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 after an evi-dentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cole
313 S.W.3d 236 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
313 S.W.3d 236, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 793, 2010 WL 2378927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pruitt-v-state-moctapp-2010.