Pruitt v. State

313 S.W.3d 236, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 793, 2010 WL 2378927
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 15, 2010·No. ED 93440·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*237 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Derrick Pruitt (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his amended motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 after an evi-dentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pruitt v. State, 313 S.W.3d 236, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 793, 2010 WL 2378927 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

313 S.W.3d 236 (Pruitt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Cole
313 S.W.3d 236 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)