State v. Cole

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Cole

203 S.W.3d 230, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1232, 2006 WL 2406245

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Cole. Read the opinion of the Court — 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1771 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 22, 2006·No. No. ED 86678·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Lance Cole (“Cole”) appeals from the decision of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, the Honorable Thomas C. Grady presiding, after a jury convicted him of one count of Forcible Sodomy, in violation of Section 566.060 RSMo. (2000).

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been given a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Lance Cole (“Cole”) appeals from the decision of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, the Honorable Thomas C. Grady presiding, after a jury convicted him of one count of Forcible Sodomy, in violation of Section 566.060 RSMo. (2000).

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been given a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Cole, 203 S.W.3d 230, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1232, 2006 WL 2406245 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

203 S.W.3d 230 (State v. Cole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.