State v. Cole

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Cole

136 S.W.3d 114, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 732, 2004 WL 1098985

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 18, 2004

DocketED 82514

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 136 S.W.3d 114 (State v. Cole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Cole, 136 S.W.3d 114, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 732, 2004 WL 1098985 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jared Cole appeals from his conviction after a bench trial of two counts of first-degree murder, one count of first-degree robbery and three counts of armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the judgment was supported by sufficient evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jared Cole appeals from his conviction after a bench trial of two counts of first-degree murder, one count of first-degree robbery and three counts of armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the judgment was supported by sufficient evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 S.W.3d 114, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 732, 2004 WL 1098985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cole-moctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack