State v. Cole

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Cole

58 S.W.3d 46, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1711, 2001 WL 1155812

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Cole. Read the opinion of the Court — 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 732 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 2, 2001·No. No. ED 79700·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James E. Cole (Appellant) appeals from the judgment denying his “Motion to Correct Manifest Injustice Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29.07(d).” We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James E. Cole (Appellant) appeals from the judgment denying his “Motion to Correct Manifest Injustice Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29.07(d).” We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Cole, 58 S.W.3d 46, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1711, 2001 WL 1155812 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

58 S.W.3d 46 (State v. Cole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.