State v. Cohen
This text of 614 P.2d 1156 (State v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The defendant was indicted for aggravated murder, ORS 163.095(2)(d), and murder under ORS 163.115(l)(b). In a trial before the court he was convicted of both charges. The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction on the ground that the indictment charging aggravated murder was insufficient. We granted the State’s petition for review.
The indictment stated in pertinent part:
"State of Oregon, Plaintiff)
vs.
INDICTMENT
Jeffrey J. Cohen,
ORS 163.095 - Count I ORS 163.115 - Count II
******
Defendant(s)
"The above-named defendant(s) is/are[1] accused by the Grand Jury of Washington County by this indictment of the crime(s) of aggravated murder in Count I, murder in Count II * * *, committed as follows:
"That the above-named defendant(s) on or about the 2nd day of May 1978, in Washington Comity, Oregon did unlawfully and knowingly commit the crime of robbery, and in the course of and in furtherance of the said crime which the said defendant was committing, the said defendant did cause the death of another human being, to-wit: Donald V. Baune, by shooting him with a firearm, to-wit: a pistol,
" COUNT n
as an alternative means of committing the crime alleged in Count I, the above-named defendant on or about the 2nd day of May, 1978, in Washington County, Oregon, did unlawfully and intentionally cause the death of another human being, to-wit: Donald V. Baune, by shooting him with a firearm, to-wit: a pistol,
«*****>?
[528]*528The majority opinion of the Court of Appeals held that Count I of the indictment alleging aggravated murder was deficient because it did not allege that the defendant "personally” committed the murder. The court then reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded for modification of defendant’s conviction from aggravated felony murder to felony murder and for entry of a new sentence.2 42 Or 297, 600 P2d 892 (1979). Chief Judge Schwab dissented, arguing that the indictment, in its entirety, clearly charges that the defendant personally shot his victim in violation of the aggravated felony murder statute.
Felony murder is defined in ORS 163.115(l)(b) as murder
«* * * committed by a person, acting either alone or with one or more persons, who commits or attempts to commit arson in the first degree, burglary in the first degree, escape in the first degree, kidnapping in the first degree, rape in the first degree, robbery in any degree or sodomy in the first degree and in the course of and in furtherance of the crime he is committing or attempting to commit, or the immediate flight therefrom, he, or another participant if there be any, causes the death of a person other than one of the participants * *
Aggravated felony murder is defined in ORS 163.095(2)(d):
"The defendant personally committed the homicide in the course or in the furtherance of the crime of robbery in any degree, kidnapping or arson in the first degree, any sexual offense specified in [ORS ch 163], or in immediate flight therefrom.”
Under ORS 132.550(7), an indictment must contain:
[529]*529"A statement of the acts constituting the offense in ordinary and concise language, without repetition, and in such manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended; * *
Under ORS 132.540(3):
"Words used in a statute to define a crime need not be strictly pursued in the indictment, but other words conveying the same meaning may be used.”
This court has stated that the objects of an indictment are (1) to inform the defendant of the nature of the crime with sufficient particularity to enable him to make his defense, (2) to identify the offense so as to enable the defendant to avail himself of his conviction or acquittal thereof if he should be prosecuted further for the same cause, and (3) to inform the court of the facts charged so that it may determine whether or not they are sufficient to support a conviction. State v. Sanders, 280 Or 685, 687-88, 572 P2d 1307 (1977); State v. Smith, 182 Or 497, 500-01, 188 P2d 998 (1948). We have further recognized that article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution guarantees that persons accused of a crime have the right to "demand the nature and cause of the accusation against him.” State v. Sanders, supra at 688.
We agree with the Court of Appeals that aggravated murder (ORS 163.095(2)(d)) and felony murder (ORS 163.115(l)(b)) are distinct offenses. Under ORS 163.115(l)(b), in order to constitute felony murder, the defendant must have been engaged in the commission of one of the specified felonies and a homicide must have been caused by the defendant or by any other participant in the crime. For aggravated felony murder, ORS 163.095(2)(d) requires that the defendant personally commit the homicide. The elements of the two crimes are the same except that aggravated felony murder under ORS 163.095(2)(d) requires one additional element: personal commission of the homicide.
[530]*530Although the indictment does not contain the word "personally” in referring to the manner in which defendant caused the death of another human being, the indictment was sufficient to notify defendant that he had to defend the charge of aggravated murder under ORS 163.095(2)(d). The indictment specifically listed the crime of aggravated murder and referred to ORS 163.095.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
614 P.2d 1156, 289 Or. 525, 1980 Ore. LEXIS 1058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cohen-or-1980.