State v. Cody
This text of 2019 ND 38 (State v. Cody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 2/21/19 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2019 ND 38
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Wesley Alan Cody, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20180229
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable David E. Reich, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Mindy L. Lawrence (argued) and Conor Kennelly (on brief), Assistant State’s Attorneys, Bismarck, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee.
Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, N.D., for defendant and appellant. State v. Cody No. 20180229
Per Curiam. [¶1] Wesley Alan Cody appeals from an amended criminal judgment finding him guilty of willfully giving false information to a law enforcement officer under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-11-03(1) and preventing arrest under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-08-02(1). Cody argues there was insufficient evidence presented by the State on both counts. [¶2] We conclude there was sufficient evidence to support the guilty verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). [¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jon J. Jensen
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2019 ND 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cody-nd-2019.