State v. Clemens
This text of 2021 ND 176 (State v. Clemens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OCTOBER 14, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2021 ND 176
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Brenda Lee Clemens, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20210136
Appeal from the District Court of Sargent County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Mark T. Blumer, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Jayne Pfau, State’s Attorney, Forman, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.
Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for defendant and appellant. State v. Clemens No. 20210136
[¶1] Brenda Lee Clemens appeals from an amended criminal judgment entered after she pled guilty to theft. Clemens argues the district court erred in awarding the restitution amount. We conclude the district court acted within statutory limits. State v. Harstad, 2020 ND 151, ¶ 7, 945 N.W.2d 265 (“When reviewing a restitution order, we look to whether the district court acted within the limits set by statute, which is a standard similar to our abuse of discretion standard.”). We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2021 ND 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-clemens-nd-2021.