State v. Claxton

899 P.2d 690, 321 Or. 377
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 20, 1995
DocketCC C90-11-36228 CA A70528 SC S41180
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 899 P.2d 690 (State v. Claxton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Claxton, 899 P.2d 690, 321 Or. 377 (Or. 1995).

Opinion

899 P.2d 690 (1995)
321 Or. 377

STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review,
v.
Frank Cornelius CLAXTON, Petitioner on Review.

CC C90-11-36228; CA A70528; SC S41180.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Submitted on Petition for Review March 23, 1994.
Decided July 20, 1995.

Steven V. Humber, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the petition for petitioner on review. With him on the petition was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

No appearance contra.

Before CARSON, C.J., and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, FADELEY, UNIS and GRABER, JJ.[**]

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in the light of *691 State v. Dominguez-Martinez, 321 Or. 206, 895 P.2d 306 (1995).

NOTES

[**] Durham, J., did not participate in this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Claxton
915 P.2d 421 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
899 P.2d 690, 321 Or. 377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-claxton-or-1995.