State v. Clark (Slip Opinion)

2015 Ohio 3580, 48 N.E.3d 506, 145 Ohio St. 3d 210
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 3, 2015·No. 2012-0215·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} This court issued its judgment in this cause affirming the judgment of the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals on October 30, 2013. State v. Clark, 137 Ohio St.3d 346, 2013-Ohio-4731, 999 N.E.2d 592.

2} On June 18, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States reversed this court’s judgment and remanded the cause to this court for further proceedings. Ohio v. Clark, — U.S.-, 135 S.Ct. 2173, 192 L.Ed.2d 306.

{¶ 3} On review of the order of the Supreme Court of the United States, we remand this cause to the court of appeals to consider defendant-appellee Darius Clark’s assignments of error, which the court of appeals had determined to be moot. See State v. Clark, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 96207, 2011-Ohio-6623, 2011 WL 6780456, ¶ 72.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Clark (Slip Opinion), 2015 Ohio 3580, 48 N.E.3d 506, 145 Ohio St. 3d 210 (Ohio 2015).

2015 Ohio 3580 (State v. Clark (Slip Opinion)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Clark (Slip Opinion)
2015 Ohio 3580 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2015)