State v. City of Newark
This text of 216 A.2d 246 (State v. City of Newark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.
Mr. Joseph A. Hoffman, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney).
Mr. William H. Walls argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Norman N. Schiff, Corporation Counsel, attorney; Mr. Joseph A. Ward, on the brief).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Crane in the Law Division, reported at 87 N.J. Super. 38 (Law Div. 1965).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
216 A.2d 246, 90 N.J. Super. 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-city-of-newark-njsuperctappdiv-1966.