State v. Chiominto
This text of 2009 Ohio 1905 (State v. Chiominto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Chiominto, 121 Ohio St.3d 606, 2009-Ohio-1905.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. CHIOMINTO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Chiominto, 121 Ohio St.3d 606, 2009-Ohio-1905.] Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on the authority of State v. Thompson. (No. 2008-1630 — Submitted April 21, 2009 — Decided April 29, 2009.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lake County, No. 2007-L-138, 2008-Ohio-3393. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Thompson, 121 Ohio St.3d 250, 2009-Ohio-314, 903 N.E.2d 618. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. __________________ Charles E. Coulson, Lake County Prosecuting Attorney, and Karen A. Sheppert, Supervisor, Appellate Division, for appellant. R. Paul LaPlante, Lake County Public Defender, and Vanessa R. Clapp, Supervising Attorney-Appellate Division, for appellee. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2009 Ohio 1905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-chiominto-ohio-2009.