State v. Chavez
This text of 190 P.3d 387 (State v. Chavez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance. Former ORS 475.992(4)(b) (2003), renumbered as ORS 475.840(3)(b) (2005). She assigns error to the admission of a laboratory report in violation of her right to confront witnesses under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution. The state concedes the error and agrees that the case should be reversed and remanded. We agree that the trial court erred and that the error requires reversal and remand. State v. Birchfield, 342 Or 624,157 P3d 216 (2007).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 P.3d 387, 221 Or. App. 202, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 993, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-chavez-orctapp-2008.