State v. Chavez

190 P.3d 387, 221 Or. App. 202, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 993
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 16, 2008·No. CF060119; A134311·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance. Former ORS 475.992(4)(b) (2003), renumbered as ORS 475.840(3)(b) (2005). She assigns error to the admission of a laboratory report in violation of her right to confront witnesses under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution. The state concedes the error and agrees that the case should be reversed and remanded. We agree that the trial court erred and that the error requires reversal and remand. State v. Birchfield, 342 Or 624,157 P3d 216 (2007).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Chavez, 190 P.3d 387, 221 Or. App. 202, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 993 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

190 P.3d 387 (State v. Chavez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Chavez
190 P.3d 387 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)