State v. Chavez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Chavez. Read the opinion of the Court — 451 P.3d 115
New Mexico Court of Appeals·Decided September 28, 2020·Unpublished

Opinion

This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

No. A-1-CA-37775

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

TEOFILO CHAVEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF QUAY COUNTY Albert J. Mitchell, Jr. , District Judge

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM

for Appellee

Dean E. Border Albuquerque, NM

for Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VARGAS, Judge.

{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

{2} AFFIRMED.

{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge WE CONCUR:

MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge

ZACHARY A. IVES, Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Chavez, (N.M. Ct. App. 2020).

State v. Chavez (State v. Chavez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.