State v. Chapman

619 So. 2d 538, 1993 La. LEXIS 1883, 1993 WL 190597
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 4, 1993·No. No. 93-KH-1405·Published

Opinion

In re Chapman, Walter; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “E”, Nos. 259-483, 260-906.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed on or about January 25, 1993. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

MARCUS, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Chapman, 619 So. 2d 538, 1993 La. LEXIS 1883, 1993 WL 190597 (La. 1993).

619 So. 2d 538 (State v. Chapman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.