State v. Chapman
This text of 619 So. 2d 538 (State v. Chapman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Chapman, Walter; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “E”, Nos. 259-483, 260-906.
The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed on or about January 25, 1993. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
619 So. 2d 538, 1993 La. LEXIS 1883, 1993 WL 190597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-chapman-la-1993.