State v. Chapman

471 So. 2d 716
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJune 20, 1985
Docket83-KA-1395
StatusPublished
Cited by29 cases

This text of 471 So. 2d 716 (State v. Chapman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Chapman, 471 So. 2d 716 (La. 1985).

Opinion

471 So.2d 716 (1985)

STATE of Louisiana
v.
Steve CHAPMAN.

No. 83-KA-1395.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 20, 1985.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Connick, Dist. Atty., Mike McMahon, Nick Noreia, Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff-appellee.

Dwight Doskey, New Orleans, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Steve Chapman, was tried by a jury and convicted of indecent behavior with a juvenile in violation of R.S. 14:81. After a hearing conducted in May of 1977, he was adjudicated a fourth offender for purposes of R.S. 15:529.1 and sentenced to twenty years at hard labor. In January of 1978, this Court then granted defendant's application for remedial writs, vacated and set aside his sentence, and remanded the case to the trial court for purposes of appointing a sanity commission "with reference to relator's mental capacity to proceed." State v. Chapman, 353 So.2d 1338, 1339 (La.1978). The trial court complied with that order, and after conducting a hearing on the commission's report in May of 1978, found that the defendant was "presently sane." The minutes for that proceeding indicate that the trial court then informed defendant of his right to appeal but did not resentence him. Therefore, defendant is not presently under sentence for his conviction.

It is settled that "... a defendant can appeal from a final judgment of conviction only where sentence has been imposed." State v. London, 316 So.2d 743 (La.1975); State v. Moore, 260 La. 299, 256 So.2d 96 (La.1971); La.C.Cr.P. art. 912. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed and this case is remanded to the trial court for resentencing in conformity with law.

APPEAL DISMISSED: CASE REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Of Louisiana v. Johnny Mitchell Skipper
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2023
State of Louisiana v. Percy Platt
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2021
State v. Kitts
250 So. 3d 939 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2018)
State v. Stiller
225 So. 3d 1154 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2017)
State v. Meadows
219 So. 3d 1200 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2017)
State v. Goodley
209 So. 3d 130 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2016)
State v. Brown
202 So. 3d 585 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2016)
State v. Williams
199 So. 3d 1205 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2016)
State v. Barbain
179 So. 3d 770 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2015)
State v. Armstead
144 So. 3d 66 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2014)
State v. Lampkin
119 So. 3d 158 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2013)
State v. Quinn
38 So. 3d 1102 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2010)
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Quinn, Sr.
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2010
State v. Walder
952 So. 2d 21 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2006)
State v. Mays
917 So. 2d 1185 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2005)
State v. Sorina
770 So. 2d 837 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2000)
State v. Horne
768 So. 2d 228 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
471 So. 2d 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-chapman-la-1985.