State v. Cecil
273 S.W.3d 583, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 181, 2009 WL 111725
Opinion
Order
Loren Cecil challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for second-degree child molestation, a violation of Section 566.068, RSMo 2000. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the conviction.
Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Cecil, 273 S.W.3d 583, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 181, 2009 WL 111725 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
273 S.W.3d 583 (State v. Cecil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Borden
273 S.W.3d 583 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)