State v. Cecil
273 S.W.3d 583, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 181, 2009 WL 111725
This text of 273 S.W.3d 583 (State v. Cecil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Cecil, 273 S.W.3d 583, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 181, 2009 WL 111725 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
Opinion
Order
Loren Cecil challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for second-degree child molestation, a violation of Section 566.068, RSMo 2000. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the conviction.
Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Borden
273 S.W.3d 583 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
273 S.W.3d 583, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 181, 2009 WL 111725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cecil-moctapp-2009.