State v. Borden

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Borden

273 S.W.3d 583, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 28, 2009 WL 113779

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 20, 2009

DocketED 90667

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 273 S.W.3d 583 (State v. Borden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Borden, 273 S.W.3d 583, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 28, 2009 WL 113779 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gary Borden appeals his conviction after a bench trial on a charge of illegal possession of wildlife (§ 252.040 RSMo, 3 CSR 10-4.136). We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No prece-dential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their *584 use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gary Borden appeals his conviction after a bench trial on a charge of illegal possession of wildlife (§ 252.040 RSMo, 3 CSR 10-4.136). We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No prece-dential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their *584 use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 S.W.3d 583, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 28, 2009 WL 113779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-borden-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack