State v. Casper

190 P.3d 385, 221 Or. App. 198, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 992
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJuly 16, 2008
DocketCR0501470; A135174
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 190 P.3d 385 (State v. Casper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Casper, 190 P.3d 385, 221 Or. App. 198, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 992 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted on one count of first-degree sexual abuse and four counts of third-degree sexual abuse. On appeal, defendant challenges the trial court’s entry of an amended judgment that imposed a compensatory fine of $9,000. The state concedes that the trial court lacked authority to impose that fine by way of an amended judgment. See State v. Pinkowsky, 111 Or App 166,168, 826 P2d 10 (1992). We agree and accept the concession.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to modify amended judgment to delete $9,000 compensatory fine.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Casper
190 P.3d 385 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 P.3d 385, 221 Or. App. 198, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-casper-orctapp-2008.