State v. Carter

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Carter

844 N.E.2d 1193, 108 Ohio St. 3d 532

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 19, 2006

DocketNos. 2004-1324 and 2004-1692

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 844 N.E.2d 1193 (State v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Carter, 844 N.E.2d 1193, 108 Ohio St. 3d 532 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Threatt, 108 Ohio St.3d 277, 2006-Ohio-905, 843 N.E.2d 164, and the judgments of the trial court denying appellee’s motions to waive court costs and to vacate the order of garnishment are reinstated.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his separate opinion in State v. White, 103 Ohio St.3d 580, 2004-Ohio-5989, 817 N.E.2d 393.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Threatt, 108 Ohio St.3d 277, 2006-Ohio-905, 843 N.E.2d 164, and the judgments of the trial court denying appellee’s motions to waive court costs and to vacate the order of garnishment are reinstated.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his separate opinion in State v. White, 103 Ohio St.3d 580, 2004-Ohio-5989, 817 N.E.2d 393.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

844 N.E.2d 1193, 108 Ohio St. 3d 532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carter-ohio-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack