State v. Carson
894 S.W.2d 212, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 346, 1995 WL 78268
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Carson. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1006 →
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202, RSMo Supp.1993. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Carson, 894 S.W.2d 212, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 346, 1995 WL 78268 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).
894 S.W.2d 212 (State v. Carson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.