State v. Carson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Carson

894 S.W.2d 212, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 346, 1995 WL 78268

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 28, 1995

DocketNo. 66216

StatusPublished

This text of 894 S.W.2d 212 (State v. Carson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Carson, 894 S.W.2d 212, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 346, 1995 WL 78268 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202, RSMo Supp.1993. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202, RSMo Supp.1993. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

894 S.W.2d 212, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 346, 1995 WL 78268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carson-moctapp-1995.