State v. Carroll

647 N.E.2d 784, 72 Ohio St. 3d 87

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 26, 1995·No. No. 94-2437·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in its opinion.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Carroll, 647 N.E.2d 784, 72 Ohio St. 3d 87 (Ohio 1995).

Pincite

647 N.E.2d 784 (State v. Carroll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.