State v. Carr
340 S.W.3d 602, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 519, 2011 WL 1531092
Opinion
Defendant Christopher Carr appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of criminal nonsupport. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Carr, 340 S.W.3d 602, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 519, 2011 WL 1531092 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
340 S.W.3d 602 (State v. Carr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
HARTISON v. State
340 S.W.3d 602 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)