State v. Carr

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Carr

262 S.W.3d 265, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1141, 2008 WL 3905963

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 26, 2008

DocketED 89940

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 262 S.W.3d 265 (State v. Carr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Carr, 262 S.W.3d 265, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1141, 2008 WL 3905963 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jantell Carr (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of one count of possession of a controlled substance, marijuana in excess of five grams, with intent to distribute, in violation of Section 195.211. 1 After finding Defendant was a persistent drug offender, the trial court sentenced him to a term of twelve years without the possibility of probation or parole, pursuant to Section 195.291.2. On appeal, Defendant asserts the trial court erred in overruling his motions for judgment of acquittal on the ground that the State failed to present sufficient evidence from which the jury could have found Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All subsequent statutory citations are to RSMo 2003 Cum.Supp., unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jantell Carr (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of one count of possession of a controlled substance, marijuana in excess of five grams, with intent to distribute, in violation of Section 195.211. 1 After finding Defendant was a persistent drug offender, the trial court sentenced him to a term of twelve years without the possibility of probation or parole, pursuant to Section 195.291.2. On appeal, Defendant asserts the trial court erred in overruling his motions for judgment of acquittal on the ground that the State failed to present sufficient evidence from which the jury could have found Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All subsequent statutory citations are to RSMo 2003 Cum.Supp., unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 S.W.3d 265, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1141, 2008 WL 3905963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carr-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack