State v. Carpenter

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Carpenter

200 S.W.3d 543, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1135, 2006 WL 2051376

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 25, 2006

DocketED 87019

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 200 S.W.3d 543 (State v. Carpenter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Carpenter, 200 S.W.3d 543, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1135, 2006 WL 2051376 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Fabian T. Carpenter (“Defendant”) appeals from a judgment after a jury found him guilty of delivery of a controlled substance in violation of Section 195.211. 1 The trial court followed the jury’s recommendation and sentenced Defendant to fifteen years’ imprisonment.

Defendant raises one point on appeal. He claims that the trial court plainly erred in allowing the State to introduce into evidence $2,775.00 found in an apartment. Defendant claims the money was irrelevant to the case because there was no evidence establishing a connection between Defendant and the apartment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo.2004, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI