Amelung v. Amelung

200 S.W.3d 543, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1136, 2006 WL 2051380
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 25, 2006·No. ED 86749·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald E. Amelung (Husband) appeals from the judgment dissolving his marriage to Christine S. Amelung (Wife), and, in relevant part, ordering Husband to pay Wife a total of $1,582 for support of the parties’ three minor children, ordering Husband to pay Wife maintenance totaling $2,000 per month, and distributing the parties’ marital property and debt.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amelung v. Amelung, 200 S.W.3d 543, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1136, 2006 WL 2051380 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

200 S.W.3d 543 (Amelung v. Amelung) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Carpenter
200 S.W.3d 543 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)