State v. Capozziello

493 A.2d 902, 4 Conn. App. 251
Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided June 18, 1985·No. 3358·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant pleaded guilty to larceny in the first degree by receiving stolen property in violation of General Statutes § 53a-122 (a) (2) after plea negotiations. After canvassing the defendant, the trial court accepted the plea of guilty under the Alford1 doctrine, and continued the case for sentencing. Before sentencing, through new counsel the defendant moved to withdraw the plea of guilty, claiming various infirmities in the trial court’s acceptance of that plea. The trial court denied the motion and sentenced the defendant. From judgment following that denial, the defendant has appealed to this court.

After reviewing the record and transcript in this matter, we find no basis on which to disturb the judgment of the trial court.

There is no error.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Capozziello, 493 A.2d 902, 4 Conn. App. 251 (Colo. Ct. App. 1985).

493 A.2d 902 (State v. Capozziello) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Capozziello
496 A.2d 199 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1985)