State v. Caldwell

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Caldwell

344 S.W.3d 887, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 906, 2011 WL 2552645

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 28, 2011

DocketED 94932

StatusPublished

This text of 344 S.W.3d 887 (State v. Caldwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Caldwell, 344 S.W.3d 887, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 906, 2011 WL 2552645 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Crystal Caldwell (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Lincoln County, following a jury trial, convicting of abuse of a child. Defendant contends that the trial court erred by denying her motion for judgment of acquittal because there was no substantial evidence which proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Defendant abused S.C. (Victim).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the trial court did not err in denying Defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI