State v. Cabc
96 N.E.2d 297, 154 Ohio St. 464
This text of 96 N.E.2d 297 (State v. Cabc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Cabc, 96 N.E.2d 297, 154 Ohio St. 464 (Ohio 1951).
Opinion
This case is before the court on demurrer to a petition in mandamus filed originally in this court, by which relator seeks a remedy available by appeal. A writ of mandamus may not be invoked as a substitute for the remedy of appeal.
The demurrer is sustained and the writ denied.
Writ denied.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, MIDDLETON, TAFT, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur. *Page 465
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State, Ex Rel. Kohr v. Hooker
152 N.E.2d 788 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1958)
State ex rel. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co. v. Industrial Commission
162 Ohio St. (N.S.) 302 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1954)
State ex rel. City of Cincinnati v. Moulton
160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 397 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1953)
State ex rel. Curry v. Monroe
159 Ohio St. (N.S.) 1 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1953)
State ex rel. Harris v. Haynes
157 Ohio St. (N.S.) 214 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1952)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
96 N.E.2d 297, 154 Ohio St. 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cabc-ohio-1951.