State ex rel. City of Cincinnati v. Moulton
This text of 160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 397 (State ex rel. City of Cincinnati v. Moulton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The cause is submitted on demurrers to respondents’ answers to relator’s petition by which relator seeks a remedy available by appeal, which appeal it has taken. A writ of mandamus may not be invoked as a substitute for the remedy of appeal. The demurrers to the answers are overruled and the writ is denied. State, ex rel. Stein, v. Sohngen, Dir., 147 Ohio St., 359, 71 N. E. (2d), 483; State, ex rel. Blackburn, v. Court of Appeals for Franklin County, 154 Ohio St., 237, 95 N. E. (2d), 273; State, ex rel. Blackburn, v. Court of Appeals for Belmont County, 154 Ohio St., 464, 96 N. E. (2d), 297.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-city-of-cincinnati-v-moulton-ohio-1953.