State v. Butler

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Butler

391 S.W.3d 536, 2013 WL 542869, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 167

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Butler. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 377 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 13, 2013·No. No. WD 74729·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Charles Butler appeals from his conviction on two counts of possession of child pornography for two videos found on his computer. Butler contends the circuit court erred in admitting evidence of other child pornography from his computer because it was inadmissible evidence of uncharged crimes. For reasons explained in [537]*537a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the convictions.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Charles Butler appeals from his conviction on two counts of possession of child pornography for two videos found on his computer. Butler contends the circuit court erred in admitting evidence of other child pornography from his computer because it was inadmissible evidence of uncharged crimes. For reasons explained in [537]*537a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the convictions.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)

State v. Butler, 391 S.W.3d 536, 2013 WL 542869, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 167 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

391 S.W.3d 536 (State v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.