State v. Butler

347 S.W.3d 185, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1150, 2011 WL 3890738
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 6, 2011
DocketED 95305
StatusPublished

This text of 347 S.W.3d 185 (State v. Butler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Butler, 347 S.W.3d 185, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1150, 2011 WL 3890738 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Marvin Butler (Defendant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis entered after a bench trial where the trial court found Defendant guilty of one count of second-degree assault and one count of armed criminal action. Defendant contends that the trial court: (1) erred in denying his motions for a continuance, to terminate counsel, and to reduce his bond; and (2) abused its discretion in failing to allow him to present a closing argument.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that no error appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Buford v. State
347 S.W.3d 185 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
347 S.W.3d 185, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1150, 2011 WL 3890738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-butler-moctapp-2011.