State v. Burton

173 S.W.3d 382, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1460, 2005 WL 2495720
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 11, 2005·No. WD 64643·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Charles Burton, was convicted of driving while intoxicated, and he now appeals. Burton claims that the trial court erred in failing to admonish the jury, sua sponte, to disregard the prosecutor’s statement during closing argument of alleged facts outside the record. Having reviewed the parties’ arguments and record on appeal, we find no plain error. A written opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. However, we have provided the parties with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Burton, 173 S.W.3d 382, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1460, 2005 WL 2495720 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

173 S.W.3d 382 (State v. Burton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jackson
173 S.W.3d 382 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)