State v. Burton

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Burton

108 S.W.3d 669, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2219, 2002 WL 31452700

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Burton. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1460 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 5, 2002·No. No. WD 60461·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan Burton appeals from his conviction of one count of first-degree murder and two counts of armed-criminal action. On appeal, the appellant argues that the trial court abused its discretion: 1) by failing to remove two jurors who may have seen him handcuffed and with three police officers; and 2) by admitting five autopsy photographs. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan Burton appeals from his conviction of one count of first-degree murder and two counts of armed-criminal action. On appeal, the appellant argues that the trial court abused its discretion: 1) by failing to remove two jurors who may have seen him handcuffed and with three police officers; and 2) by admitting five autopsy photographs. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Burton, 108 S.W.3d 669, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2219, 2002 WL 31452700 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

108 S.W.3d 669 (State v. Burton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.