State v. Bumgarner

209 P.3d 857, 229 Or. App. 92, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 748
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided June 10, 2009·No. 03CR1425FE; A126264·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The state petitions this court to reconsider its decision in State v. Bumgarner, 219 Or App 617, 184 P3d 1143, rev den, 345 Or 175 (2008), cert den,_US_, 129 S Ct 927 (2009). In Bumgarner, we affirmed defendant’s convictions but remanded for resentencing. The state now contends that, in light of Oregon v. Ice, 555 US_, 129 S Ct 711, 172 L Ed 2d 517 (2009), we erred in remanding for resentencing. We agree and, accordingly, modify our opinion and affirm.

Reconsideration allowed; former disposition withdrawn; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified; affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Bumgarner, 209 P.3d 857, 229 Or. App. 92, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 748 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

209 P.3d 857 (State v. Bumgarner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bumgarner
209 P.3d 857 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)