State v. Buckner
Opinion
ORDER
Kevin Buckner (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction of one count of trafficking in the second degree, one count of possession of a controlled substance, and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia. Defendant claims there was insufficient evidence to support his convictions for trafficking and possession of a controlled substance. He also argues the trial court erred in allowing evidence regarding cocaine base, heroin, *301 and drug paraphernalia found in his home, and the court erred in denying his peremptory strike of a juror.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
283 S.W.3d 300 (State v. Buckner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.