Eddy v. Armstrong

Missouri Court of Appeals

Eddy v. Armstrong

283 S.W.3d 300, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 640, 2009 WL 1383609

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 19, 2009

DocketED 91257

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 283 S.W.3d 300 (Eddy v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eddy v. Armstrong, 283 S.W.3d 300, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 640, 2009 WL 1383609 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment in defendant’s favor in an action for money had and received. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for'this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied as moot. Defendant’s motion for sanctions is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI