State v. Bryan
915 P.2d 482, 140 Or. App. 446, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 512
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 17, 1996·No. 94CR-2562FE; CA A88506·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Defendant appeals from his convictions for felony murder, manslaughter in the first degree, kidnapping in the first degree and failure to perform the duties of a driver. ORS 163.115; ORS 163.118; ORS 163.235; ORS 811.705. We write only to address defendant’s contention that the court erred in denying his motions for a new trial on the basis of inconsistent verdicts. Inconsistency of verdicts is not a basis on which to grant a new trial. State v. Watkins, 67 Or App 657, 679 P2d 882, rev den 297 Or 272 (1984).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Bryan, 915 P.2d 482, 140 Or. App. 446, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 512 (Or. Ct. App. 1996).
915 P.2d 482 (State v. Bryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Bryan
915 P.2d 482 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)