State v. Bryan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Bryan

112 N.C. 848

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedFebruary 15, 1893

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 112 N.C. 848 (State v. Bryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Bryan, 112 N.C. 848 (N.C. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam

: The omission of the word “feloniously” in indictments for obtaining goods by false pretenses is, since the passage of the Act of 1891, ch. 205, a fatal defect, as the Attorney (General admits. State v. Skidmore, 109 N. C., 795.

It is not improper to say, however, in view of the contention of counsel, that there is more than a scintilla of evidence to support the charge, if preferred in the required form. Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

: The omission of the word “feloniously” in indictments for obtaining goods by false pretenses is, since the passage of the Act of 1891, ch. 205, a fatal defect, as the Attorney (General admits. State v. Skidmore, 109 N. C., 795.

It is not improper to say, however, in view of the contention of counsel, that there is more than a scintilla of evidence to support the charge, if preferred in the required form. Error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 N.C. 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bryan-nc-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack