State v. Bruce
This text of 2009 Ohio 6090 (State v. Bruce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Bruce, 123 Ohio St.3d 464, 2009-Ohio-6090.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. BRUCE, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Bruce, 123 Ohio St.3d 464, 2009-Ohio-6090.] Discretionary appeal accepted and court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Hunter. (No. 2009-0844 — Submitted August 11, 2009 — Decided November 24, 2009.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 90897, 2009-Ohio-1067. __________________ {¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I. {¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Hunter, 123 Ohio St.3d 164, 2009-Ohio-4147, 915 N.E.2d 292. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. __________________ William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and T. Allan Regas, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Paul A. Kuzmins, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. _____________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2009 Ohio 6090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-bruce-ohio-2009.