State v. Brown

697 N.E.2d 223, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1486, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2459
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 74 Ohio St. 3d 630
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 30, 1998·No. 98-1359·Published

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-980060. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. On July 20, 1998, appellee filed a document titled “Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” The motion to dismiss is, in substance, a response to appellant’s memorandum in support of jurisdiction and, as such, is untimely. Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits the untimely filing of a document.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellee’s document titled “Motion to Dismiss Appeal” be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Brown, 697 N.E.2d 223, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1486, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2459 (Ohio 1998).

697 N.E.2d 223 (State v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.