State v. Brown

660 N.E.2d 448, 74 Ohio St. 3d 523
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 14, 1996·No. No. 95-2122·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. In this court, appellant makes no attempt to establish good cause, but instead argues the questions he wanted the court of appeals to hear, but which it did not hear. The application was rejected for failure to state a good cause for late filing. That is the issue before this court. Since appellant does not even address the issue, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Brown, 660 N.E.2d 448, 74 Ohio St. 3d 523 (Ohio 1996).

660 N.E.2d 448 (State v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Brown
1996 Ohio 44 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)