State v. Brown

629 N.E.2d 453, 68 Ohio St. 3d 1477, 1994 Ohio LEXIS 603
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 63 Ohio St. 3d 349
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1994·No. 93-221·Published

Opinion

Lucas County, No. L-92-145. This cause is pending before the court on the filing of a motion for leave to appeal from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County and as a claimed appeal as of,right. Appellant’s motion to file memorandum in support of jurisdiction instanter was denied by this court on May 26,1993. Appellant’s motion for rehearing of the denial of the motion to file instanter was denied by this court on July 14,1993. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed sua sponte, effective March 14, 1994.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Brown, 629 N.E.2d 453, 68 Ohio St. 3d 1477, 1994 Ohio LEXIS 603 (Ohio 1994).

629 N.E.2d 453 (State v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.