State v. Brown

921 S.W.2d 146, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 755, 1996 WL 208368
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1827
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 30, 1996·No. No. 69582·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State of Missouri appeals the dismissal of the driving while intoxicated charge against defendant Gene G. Brown. The trial court found the prosecution of the charge violated the Double Jeopardy Clause because defendant previously had his license administratively suspended.

This case is controlled by the Missouri Supreme Court’s recent decision in State v. Mayo, 915 S.W.2d 758 (Mo. banc 1996). There, the court held a charge of driving while intoxicated is not barred by Double Jeopardy because the defendant’s license had been administratively suspended. Thus, it reversed the trial court’s dismissal of the charge against the defendant.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Brown, 921 S.W.2d 146, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 755, 1996 WL 208368 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

921 S.W.2d 146 (State v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Mayo
915 S.W.2d 758 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1996)