State v. Brown

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Brown

862 S.W.2d 926

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 21, 1993

DocketNos. 61495, 63460

StatusPublished

This text of 862 S.W.2d 926 (State v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Brown, 862 S.W.2d 926 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction for forcible rape, § 566.030, RSMo 1986, and kidnapping, § 565.110, RSMo 1986. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 Motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find defendant’s claims of error are without merit. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.-16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction for forcible rape, § 566.030, RSMo 1986, and kidnapping, § 565.110, RSMo 1986. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 Motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find defendant’s claims of error are without merit. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.-16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

862 S.W.2d 926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brown-moctapp-1993.