State v. Brown

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Brown

41 S.W. 1101, 139 Mo. 522, 1897 Mo. LEXIS 189

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 153 Mo. 578 →

Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided June 8, 1897·Published

Opinion

Gantt, P. J.

The defendant was indicted, tried and convicted of sodomy in the circuit court of Clinton county. He was allowed an appeal to this court and time to file a bill of exceptions. He failed to avail himself of the privilege. After the expiration of the time so allowed the transcript of the record proper was duly certified to this court. We discover no error in the indictment, arraignment or record proper. The judgment is affirmed.

Sherwood and Burgess, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gantt, P. J.

The defendant was indicted, tried and convicted of sodomy in the circuit court of Clinton county. He was allowed an appeal to this court and time to file a bill of exceptions. He failed to avail himself of the privilege. After the expiration of the time so allowed the transcript of the record proper was duly certified to this court. We discover no error in the indictment, arraignment or record proper. The judgment is affirmed.

Sherwood and Burgess, JJ., concur.

State v. Brown, 41 S.W. 1101, 139 Mo. 522, 1897 Mo. LEXIS 189 (Mo. 1897).

Pincite

41 S.W. 1101 (State v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.