State v. Brown
This text of 55 S.W. 76 (State v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was convicted in the Barton Circuit Court on an information filed in that court by the prosecuting attorney touching a slot machine. Being convicted, defendant appealed to the Kansas City Court of Appeals, which transferred this cause to this court.
[579]*579The only section in relation to a defendant taking an appeal is where he is convicted on a charge contained in an indictment. [Section 4277, R. S. 1889.] The right of appeal does not exist except as the result of statutory enactment. There is no such enactment as to informations, and the right of appeal was unknown to the common law. [State ex rel. v. Woodson, 128 Mo. loc. cit. 514.] Similar views were expressed by us in relation to the State talcing an appeal from a judgment quashing an information. [State v. Clipper, 142 Mo. 474; State v. Carr, Ib. 607; State v. Cornelius, 143 Mo. 179. See, also, Sutherland Stat. Const., secs. 326, 327 and 328; Maguire v. State Savings Ass’n, 62 Mo. loc. cit. 346.]
Eor these reasons no appeal lay from the Barton Circuit Court, and the appeal taken therefrom is hereby dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 S.W. 76, 153 Mo. 578, 1900 Mo. LEXIS 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brown-mo-1900.