State v. Brown

341 So. 2d 1, 1976 La. LEXIS 5012
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 322 So. 2d 211
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 22, 1976·No. No. 58463·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On May 1,1975, the Orleans Parish Grand Jury indicted defendant, Thomas Brown, Jr., for the crime of aggravated rape, a violation of La.R.S. 14:42. He was convicted by a unanimous jury and sentenced to death, the penalty then required by law.

We have reviewed the single assignment of error urged by defendant on appeal and find it to be without merit. Defendant complains of the trial court’s refusal to order extended pre-trial discovery. The decisions of this Court holding that a defendant is not entitled to the requested information are legion. He is entitled to know what the State intends to prove but not the evidence to be used. See, State v. Hunter, 340 So.2d 226 (La.1976); State v. Huizar, 332 So.2d 449 (La.1976); State v. Jones, 332 So.2d 267 (La.1976); State v. Ball, 328 So.2d 81 (La.1976); State v. Chase, 327 So.2d 391 (La.1976). Furthermore, the case of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963) is not apposite here because defendant has neither alleged nor shown that the information and evidence sought were favorable to the defense. State v. Edgecombe, 275 So.2d 740 (La.1973). A discussion of defendant’s individual requests would neither clarify our holding nor contribute to the jurisprudence and consequently we have decided to accord them only summary treatment in this opinion. See, State v. Duhon, 340 So.2d 151 (La.1976).

However, the death penalty imposed must be annulled and set aside in accordance with the decisions of the United States Supreme Court in Roberts v. Louisiana, 428 U.S. 325, 96 S.Ct. 3001, 49 L.Ed.2d 974 (1976) and Selman v. Louisiana, 428 U.S. 906, 96 S.Ct. 3214, 50 L.Ed.2d 1212 (1976).

The case must be remanded for resen-tencing of defendant to the most serious [2]*2penalty for a lesser included offense at the time the crime was committed (February 23, 1975). State v. Lee, 340 So.2d 180 (La.1976), State v. Craig, 340 So.2d 191 (La.1976); State v. Watkins, 340 So.2d 235 (La.1976); State v. Sledge, 340 So.2d 205 (La.1976). At that time, attempted aggravated rape was punishable by imprisonment at hard labor for not more than twenty years, La.R.S. 14:27(D)(1), and simple rape was punishable by imprisonment at hard labor for not less than one nor more than twenty years, La.R.S. 14:43. The legislature obviously intended to impose the most serious penalty available under the law. In this case, although there is a range of from one to twenty years, the most serious penalty is twenty years at hard labor. Thus, we direct the trial court on remand to sentence defendant to imprisonment at hard labor for a period of twenty years.

Accordingly, the conviction is affirmed and the case is remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Brown, 341 So. 2d 1, 1976 La. LEXIS 5012 (La. 1976).

341 So. 2d 1 (State v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brady v. Maryland
373 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Roberts v. Louisiana
428 U.S. 325 (Supreme Court, 1976)
State v. Huizar
332 So. 2d 449 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1976)
State v. Jones
332 So. 2d 267 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1976)
State v. Ball
328 So. 2d 81 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1976)
State v. Hunter
340 So. 2d 226 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1976)
State v. Sledge
340 So. 2d 205 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1976)
State v. Duhon
340 So. 2d 151 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1976)
State v. Craig
340 So. 2d 191 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1976)
State v. Lee
340 So. 2d 180 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1976)
State v. Watkins
340 So. 2d 235 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1976)
State v. Chase
327 So. 2d 391 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1976)
State v. Edgecombe
275 So. 2d 740 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1973)
Selman v. Louisiana
428 U.S. 906 (Supreme Court, 1976)