State v. Brown

508 So. 2d 542, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1485, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8854
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 527 So. 2d 209
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 16, 1987·No. Nos. 86-2688, 86-2689·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellee, James D. Brown, concedes that the trial court did not furnish any reasons, written or otherwise, for its downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. We reverse the sentences imposed and remand to the trial court with directions to resentence the defendant within the guidelines. In so doing, v/e direct the trial court’s attention to Williams v. State, 500 So.2d 501, 503 (Fla.1986), wherein the court stated, “If a departure is not supported by clear and convincing reasons, the mere fact that a defendant agrees to it does not make it a legal sentence.” See [543]*543also State v. McCarthy, 502 So.2d 955 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Brown, 508 So. 2d 542, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1485, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8854 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

508 So. 2d 542 (State v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McCarthy
502 So. 2d 955 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Williams v. State
500 So. 2d 501 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)